Physicists Found their Higgs Particle: Ufologists Found Their ??? – UFO Conjecture(s)


Copyright 2017, InterAmerica, Inc.

In the world of the paranormal and ufology, there are lots
of misses and no hits, none at all: no ghosts, no Big Foot, no Loch Ness
monster, not one UFO or even a bona fide photograph of one, nada.

Meanwhile scientists, especially physicists, have captured
something more elusive than a UFO – the Higgs boson.

The Higgs particle was conjectured, predicted by creative,
brilliant speculation, deduced from an examination of the quantum milieu, and
nothing more.

Science is wonderful – psychotic at its roots (about which I
will present, upcoming, some supporting comments for thinking so) – and able to
conjure truths, often from nothing more than intuitive insight by persons who
pursue hypotheses and theories doggedly.

Meanwhile there has been and continues to be a UFO milieu,
funky, but more tangible than the quantum “reality” from which the Higgs was
garnered, and nothing has come forth of value, at all, from “study” and
hypotheses or limp insights of that UFO milieu.

UFOs or flying saucers have been with us, allegedly, since
1947, and before.

The Higgs was only suggested in 1960, thirteen years later
than the initial spate of flying disks appeared.

Yet, the Higgs has been verified and flying saucers, UFOs,
not at all – nary a scintilla of verification, nothing tangible or even
semi-tangible, just a canon of witness (or witless) accounts.

Why is this?

Are UFOs more elusive than quantum particles, more

Or are those who’ve been on the trail of flying saucers or
UFOs not as skilled at coping with something as mysterious or baffling as UFOs
(or those other paranormal things named above)?

There are data from or about UFOs that make quantum
particle data look like a primer for simpletons.

Yet, no UFO datum has produced one iota of substance from
which a person might come to a probability or theory that proves UFOs actually

There are reports, as UFO skeptics acknowledge, but nothing
more – nothing substantive, nothing to grab hold of, nothing to indicate that
UFOs are real phenomena.

Where is the Peter Higgs of “ufology”?


Source link

Facebook Comments



20 + 19 =