By Derrick Broze
The U.S. Congress has passed the National Defense Authorization
Act (NDAA) 2017 with provisions that will force women to sign up for
potential military draft and continues the practice of indefinite
On Tuesday, the U.S. Senate approved a $602 billion annual defense
budget that President Obama has promised to veto because the bill does
not allow for the closing of the military prison at Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba. Senate Bill 2943, the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2017, passed with a vote of 85 Senators in favor and 13 against.
Before the vote, Senator John McCain tweeted that “It’s never been more urgent to give our troops the resources they need to succeed.”
The majority of Congress have no issue taking money from the American
people and redistributing it to fund their empire. The conflict arises
when lawmakers begin debating whose pet projects are going to get a
boost. The major conflicts in passing the bill stemmed from various
amendments dealing with how the military budget will be spent.
One issue the entire Congress seemed to agree on was voting against
closing military bases around the world. While the Pentagon called for
budget cuts stating that the military has more space than they need,
Congress refused to go along with the cuts. “Besides, several lawmakers
have argued that the Pentagon has cooked the books to justify its
conclusions or at least didn’t do the math completely,” the Associated Press reports. The Senate also voted against an amendment to close the infamous military detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Another contentious area of debate was the mandate to force women who
turn 18 on or after Jan. 1, 2018 to register for Selective Service.
Males are already required register within 30 days of their 18th
birthday. The United States has maintained a volunteer military force
since 1973, but through Selective Service the military could reinstate a
draft and call upon registered males and females. Those who do not
register could face up to five years in prison and a fine of up to
$250,000, although the penalty has rarely been enforced.
The most horrendous part of the NDAA 2017 is that that the annual
military budget continues to include a provision which allows for
indefinite detention of American citizens without a right to trial. Many
of you may remember that President Obama had no problem signing the
NDAA 2012 in 2011, which legalized the indefinite detention of American
citizens suspected of ties to terrorism. The indefinite detention
provision is still contained in the NDAA, and has been approved by
Congress and signed by President Obama every year since it first passed.
On Thursday June 9, Senators Mike Lee of Utah, Rand Paul of Kentucky,
and Dianne Feinstein of California spoke on the floor of the Senate in
support of an amendment bill which would have removed the indefinite
detention clause from NDAA 2017 and offered protections to American
citizens weary of a federal government with too much power. The “Due Process Guarantee Amendment to the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2017” would have clarified “that
an authorization to use military force, a declaration of war, or any
similar authority shall not authorize the detention without charge or
trial of a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States.”
“This amendment addresses a little known problem that I believe most
Americans would be shocked to discover even exists,” Senator Mike Lee
said from the floor of the U.S. Senate. “Under current law, the federal
government has proclaimed the power, has arrogated to itself the power
to obtain indefinitely without charge or trial U.S. Citizens and lawful
permanent residents who are apprehended on American soil. Let that sink
in for just a minute.” Senator Lee also reminded the Congress that the
last time the U.S. federal government detained Americans was the
internment of Japanese Americans during the Second World War.
Senator Rand Paul noted that President Obama recognized the danger of
granting the federal government the power to indefinitely detain
Americans. Upon signing the bill in 2011 President Obama added a signing
statement promising not to use the power. “He said, this is a terrible
power and I promise never to use it. Any president who says a power is
so terrible he’s not going to use it should not be on the books,” Paul
stated. “Someday there will be someone in charge of the government that
makes a grievous mistake, like rounding up the Japanese. So we have to
be very, very careful about giving power to our government.”
Senator Feinstein, Paul, and Lee attempted to pass an earlier version of this amendment in the 2012 before the amendment was taken out of the NDAA. The dangerous language within the NDAA comes from Sections 1021 and 1022,
which include language that allows the government to detain anyone so
charged “without trial until the end of the hostilities.” Thankfully,
localities and states like Virginia are fighting back against the NDAA’s indefinite detention clause.
Unfortunately, the federal government will continue to have the
ability to indefinitely detain American citizens. This is especially
worrisome going into 2017 when a new president, one who hasn’t promised not to detain you, will be claiming the Oval Office. What will he or she do with the power to indefinitely detain Americans? Only time will tell.
To fight the National Defense Authorization Act check out People Against the NDAA (PANDA)
By Derrick Broze via Activist Post
Image Credit: TheFreeThoughtProject.com
Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for ActivistPost.com and the founder of the TheConsciousResistance.com. Follow him on Twitter.
Derrick is available for interviews.
This article may be freely reposted in part or in full with author attribution and source link.