A mechanical engineer who has been working for NASA for quite some time, Dr. Norman Bergrun has came out in an interview to explain what is really happening out in space. He had assisted in various publications for NASA, and worked with them for over a decade.
While his testimony alone is not enough to prove what he says, if you consider that there are thousands of others, who have worked closely with NASA and been exposed to mountains of sensitive data, it would seem ignorant to simply dismiss them as conspiracy theorists because we have been told otherwise “officially”.
In the interview, Bergrun discusses an account that he had with another person, who he considered a very reliable source, in which they discussed how NASA alters footage taken of the moon. Going on further, he states how the footage alteration was supposedly covered up, yet he was still able to access it, which the source found intriguing.
You can watch the full interview below, however, his account is not the only one.
While we have been told various stories regarding the moon, and what has happened up there in space, the truth is probably far from what we have been told.
One United States Army Command Sergeant, Major Bob Dean, served as an intelligence analyst for NATO. According to him,
“Ladies and gentlemen, my government, NASA, which many of us in the United States say stands for Never A Straight Answer, proceeded to erase 40 rolls of film of the Apollo Program — the flight to the Moon, the flight around the Moon, the landings on the Moon, the walking guys here and there. They erased, for Christ’s sake, 40 rolls of film of those events. Now we’re talking about several thousand individual frames that were taken that the so-called authorities determined that you did not have a right to see. Oh, they were ‘disruptive,’ ‘socially unacceptable,’ ‘politically unacceptable.’ I’ve become furious. I’m a retired Command Sergeant Major. I was never famous for having a lot of patience. ”
Donna Hare, who had secret clearance at NASA while she was working for contractor Philco Ford, has come forward with hundreds of other insider witnesses that have participated in Dr. Steven Greer’s Disclosure Project to testify about their experiences while working with NASA.
Donna’s job was to airbrush evidence of UFO’s out of photographs before they were released to the public.
Russia has come out and called for an international investigation into the U.S Moon landings, and obviously for good reasons.
Vladimir Markin, who is a spokesman for Russia’s official government investigative committee has argued that an investigation could expose the truth that has been hidden from the public for a number of years.
What they are referring to is the disappearance of the film footage that was made during the original moon landing in 1969. They are also referencing the 400 kgs of lunar rock that were obtained during the missions between 1969-1972.
“We are not contending that they did not fly [to the moon], and simply made a film about it. But all of these scientific — or perhaps cultural — artifacts are part of the legacy of humanity, and their disappearance without a trace is our common loss. An investigation will reveal what happened.”
Another man, Dr. Brian O’Leary, who was a close colleague of Carl Sagan’s conducted research that now has many people believing that UFO’s are in fact real.
O’Leary worked closely with Carl Sagan, however, before that, he was an astronaut with NASA in 1967. Merely a year after that, Sagan recruited him to teach at Cornell.
“Carl Sagan called me from Cornell and asked me to join the faculty. I accepted the offer and spent many years at Cornell in the astronomy department, planetary science department. And I became very creative in research then, but still within the bounds of western science, but in the planetary exploration program. That was for a period of about a decade.”
During his time at Cornell, he and Sagan made a close friendship, but later on, when O’Leary left Cornell, they had a bit of falling out.
“It was… One very cold snowy day in May, I landed in Syracuse, and there was a horizontal blizzard — in May — and I said: That’s it for upstate New York. And Carl thought that was very frivolous. Because, of course, he was kind of an empire-builder kind of guy; and he also had a huge ego.”
After he left, O’Leary started to examine some of Carl’s work. He said that the famous “Face” in Cydonia on Mars — photographed by Viking in 1975, this enormous formation (about a mile across) resembled a human face and created a major buzz at the time — was tampered with by Sagan before being released to the public:
“It was very, very disappointing to me because not only was Carl wrong, he also fudged data. He published a picture of the “Face” in Parade Magazine, a popular article, saying that the ‘Face’ was just a natural formation, but he doctored the picture to make it not look like a face.”
In May of 1990, O’Leary released a paper which he titled “Analysis of Images of the Face on Mars and Possible Intelligent Origin” that demonstrated further criticism and skepticism from O’Leary.
“I began to realize, just directly from the scientific point of view, not only hearsay, that this man was colluding with NASA, that there might be more to this than before. . . . Carl was on a committee with a number of notable people. There was a report issued by the Brookings Institution in 1961 — and that’s about when I knew Carl, during those years; the ’60s mostly was when I worked closely with him — that he and this other group said: Well, if any ETs ever showed up on the Earth, it has to be covered up. That’s the only way we’re going to be able to manage this, because if we can’t, then it would be too much of a culture shock.”
The statement could be considered to be a bit shocking, and the researcher goes on further to say in the interview that Carl and his colleagues had recommended that the UFO phenomenon be covered up. In his opinion, because of this, there was an ongoing cover-up within the U.S government and NASA. With so many statements that have been made by past employees of NASA, could it be true that what we have been kept in the dark?